To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080912
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 10:31
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 80
41% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 78.7
8-Core 78.2
10% 78.4 Pts
64-Core 81.2
5% 81.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
Zotac(19DA A012) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 0.31
1% 0.96 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 124 112 124 126 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 139
Mixed 32
SusWrite 123
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 107%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
6GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.1 4.8 5.2 4.9 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Read 6.8
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 5
8% 5.78 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 16%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
119GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 16.2
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 16.7
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 57%
StoreJet Transcend 4TB
490GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 26.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 16.3
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback