Today's hottest deals

Biostar A960D+V3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+V3  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180110
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 22 '19 at 19:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 130
60% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 277
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 1827 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 33.2
29% 31.7 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 34.1
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 108 61 61 63 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.7% Above average
Read 248
Write 180
Mixed 207
SusWrite 94.4
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 26.7
106% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 116
91% 124 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
786GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 168 167 169 170 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 163
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 169
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.3
245% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.1
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960D+V3 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback