Asus X75A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus X75A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75A
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '19 at 21:00
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 84.7
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 86.8
51% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 157
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 1.44
2% 2.24 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.96
2% 2.69 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 225 187 255 221 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31% Below average
Read 144
Write 102
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 215
31% 136 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 9.6
38% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 7.9
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 9.2
7% 9.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 31%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Asint SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75A Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback