Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 837 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 216 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 599 61% 494 Pts	64-Core 595 37% 595 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200 4,250 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Dell(1028 17B0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 14.7 Parallax 17.3 16% 17.1 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 14.4 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SC401 SATA 256GB 2,615 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: 90000121 SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 162 148 150 150 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 456 Write 333 Mixed 344 SusWrite 183 73% 329 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 31.9 107% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 263 194% 254 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA82GS6CJR8N-UH 2x16GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 48.7 MC Write 56.4 MC Mixed 26.9 126% 44 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 40.4 SC Mixed 20.7 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	632x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	565x
Quadro M2200NvidiaBench 19%, 2,904 samples	495x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	157x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	154x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	72x

RAM
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 4,851 samples	237x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 27,567 samples	214x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 4x8GBUnknownBench 76%, 297 samples	97x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $33