Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 179 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 340 47% 348 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770 16,639 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 03FE) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Lighting 13.5 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 11.9 11% 12 fps	MRender 9.86 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 12.1 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 279GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 131 146 160 136 151 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	70% Very good	Read 106 Write 35.7 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 138 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 112%
USB Flash Memory 1GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 6540 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 5 5.1 5.1 4.3 4.8 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Read 11.7 Write 4 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 4.8 7% 5.82 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 10GB 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.9% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 10.1 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,147x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,061x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325