Positivo VJF154

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo VJF154  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJF154
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160811
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 18 '19 at 08:08
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 129
59% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 197
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 2425) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 8.54
Parallax 5.59
0% 4.72 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 12.6
7% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
590GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 39 39 41 38 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 12
Write 41.7
Mixed 25
SusWrite 40.8
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
129% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 71%
Mass Storage Device 500GB
155GB free (System drive), PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 12 10 6.8 6.7 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 37.8
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 9.7
35% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AEDS1600W4G11-BNAD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJF154 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJF154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback