Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 07:53
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K
None, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 140
47% 83 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 517
40% 359 Pts
64-Core 922
57% 922 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 86GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 0 1.6 3.3 2.1 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 36.5
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 2.3
22% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 101%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 129GB
22GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 0 4.3 6.1 2.3 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 33.1
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 3.7
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 81%
Synology iSCSI Storage 537GB
309GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 0 5.3 21 4 8.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 62.2
Write 49.4
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 7.5
26% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 3
662% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
3968, 4224 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 45.4
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 106%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback