Acer Aspire TC-105

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-105  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-105
Memory10.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '16 at 22:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 92%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 119
50% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 191
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 61.8
60% 68.9 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 68
Splatting 70.4
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1211 480GB SSD
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS121101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 505
Write 407
Mixed 428
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 7.62
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 11.9
32% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 74.6
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 53.1
36% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
884GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 162
Mixed 155
124% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.16
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.36
130% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G CT51264BD160B.C16F ACR16D3LU1KDG/2G CT51264BD160B.C16F 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.5
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-105 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback