Asus A88XM-E/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-E/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 16:04
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 96.8
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 106
59% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 183
20% 161 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 11.8
8% 10.6 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 13.1
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 294 293 279 290 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 326
Write 255
Mixed 231
SusWrite 284
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 26.2
91% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 140
114% 163 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 98%
Toshiba eMLC NGFF 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: Q0512A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 350 368 374 377 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 378
Write 345
Mixed 262
SusWrite 349
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 26.1
83% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 138
114% 165 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
32.3% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 51
78% 51 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-E/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-E/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $492
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback