Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 21:06
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 49.2
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 71.5
38% 59.6 Pts
4-Core 29.1
8-Core 69.6
6% 49.3 Pts
64-Core 50.9
3% 50.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 14.6
3% 10.8 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 17.1
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 164 119 138 103 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 406
Write 43.5
Mixed 348
SusWrite 146
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 140 142 147 144 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 115
Write 136
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 140
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 84%
Mass Storage Device 268GB
250GB free, PID 125c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.6
5% 5.33 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 08S2400CL160 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 1.7
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback