Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 20:02
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$208
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 159
2-Core 317
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 637
8-Core 1,025
102% 831 Pts
64-Core 1,317
82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 196
Parallax 178
136% 180 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 180
Splatting 123
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Lighting 8.73
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 8.84
7% 10.1 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 7.87
Splatting 17.4
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1148 643 643 644 635 631 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,752
Write 2,251
Mixed 704
SusWrite 724
356% 1,608 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 61.3
234% 90.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,540
DQ Write 1,341
DQ Mixed 1,143
938% 1,341 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 290%
Great: 313%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 148 148 148 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 161
Write 153
Mixed 112
SusWrite 147
192% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 61%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 1.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 115
Write 116
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 0.7
106% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 59%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
863GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 159 159 158 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 166
Write 158
Mixed 122
SusWrite 158
204% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
121% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 65%
WDC WD10 03FZEX-00MK2A0 1TB
930GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 159 159 158 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 173
Write 168
Mixed 138
SusWrite 158
215% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.5
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $948
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback