Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700T 5,592 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 232 74% 135 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 620 64% 517 Pts	64-Core 772 48% 772 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 312D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6287 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	5.23% Terrible	Lighting 5.03 Reflection 8.42 Parallax 6.22 4% 6.56 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 5.93 Splatting 12.7 7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.23% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G-1001 512GB 6,098 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10130101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,650 Write 1,880 Mixed 1,494 375% 1,675 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 59.1 201% 77.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,069 DQ Write 933 DQ Mixed 963 732% 988 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 264%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 3.5TB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 54 53 51 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20% Poor	Read 44.1 Write 48.7 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 50.8 63% 45.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 1x16GB 6,417 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.5% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 12.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 14.2 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16