MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B85
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 09:34
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 230
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 706
72% 580 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 48.5
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 65.9
40% 59.5 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 53.5
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$38
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1462 403 399 402 403 403 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,459
Write 2,187
Mixed 1,534
SusWrite 579
377% 1,690 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 77.6
252% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 691
504% 663 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 241%
Great: 302%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 169 179 183 184 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 161
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 172
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.8
244% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 104%
SanDisk Ultra T C 64GB
28GB free, PID 5596
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 135
Write 15
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 18.9
49% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.4
138% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 41%
KINGSTON SA400S37480G 480GB
423GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 122 119 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 109
Mixed 118
SusWrite 120
165% 125 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 10.7
1,031% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 8.5
DQ Write 21.4
DQ Mixed 12.1
1,171% 14 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 108%
Great: 158%
OCZ-AGIL ITY4 256GB
71GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 122 119 118 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
129% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 188
Mixed 121
SusWrite 120
201% 150 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 15.2
1,396% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 37.2
DQ Mixed 18.2
1,936% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 129%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.1% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 26.9
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) Builds (Compare 4,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $576
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback