Asus P6T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '19 at 16:21
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 104
49% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 369
31% 270 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
XFX(1682 2980) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 10
0% 6.58 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.91 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ-AGILITY 64GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0956
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.7 14 9.2 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Read 9.3
Write 45.5
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 10.6
16% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 2.4
372% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 64%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
101GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 58 63 62 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 43
Write 35.8
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 60.8
30% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 16.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback