MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 01 '19 at 12:33
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 680
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 930
58% 930 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 177
Parallax 166
112% 160 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 157
Splatting 120
108% 133 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 169 191 193 211 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 475
Write 226
Mixed 160
SusWrite 193
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 25.3
118% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 59.4
104% 209 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 85%
CLOVER CD204UI 2TB
545GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 32
Write 37
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 37.5
49% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TZD1G816U26-SK001 TZD1G1616U26-SK001 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 38.4
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 32.5
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback