Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	38.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171019
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	May 27 '19 at 05:06
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Memory 90.5 1-Core 136 2-Core 272 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 847 84% 685 Pts	64-Core 987 61% 987 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.6% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 117 Parallax 63.6 85% 95.1 fps	MRender 82.8 Gravity 84.9 Splatting 101 75% 89.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 217 164 157 187 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 369 Write 405 Mixed 286 SusWrite 203 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 33.4 132% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 176 151% 218 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 286GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 65 66 64 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 90.2 Write 81.5 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 64 54% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 68%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 241GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 90 90 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 107 Write 89.7 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 89.8 63% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 769GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 124 123 123 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 154 Write 116 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 123 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 76%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 112 107 119 96 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 143 Write 142 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 110 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 164% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 100%
WDC WDS1 00T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 180% 931GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 121 122 122 122 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	138% Outstanding	Read 230 Write 223 Mixed 162 SusWrite 121 242% 184 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 14.7 1,374% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 13.8 DQ Write 32.9 DQ Mixed 15.7 1,704% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 222%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 121 122 121 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 138 Write 139 Mixed 104 SusWrite 121 169% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB 2,431 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.9% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 24.4 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 30.7 SC Mixed 24.5 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,520x
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	837x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	575x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	404x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	343x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	146x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $648

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16