Asus P6T WS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T WS PRO (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090911
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 20 '19 at 21:08
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 75 1-Core 69.2 2-Core 115 54% 86.3 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 246 28% 217 Pts	64-Core 245 15% 245 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E218) 2GB CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.2 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Lighting 27.4 Reflection 12.6 Parallax 27.5 22% 22.5 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 9.2 Splatting 15.3 10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 57 17 31 18 6 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.3% Poor	Read 113 Write 97.8 Mixed 104 SusWrite 28.4 19% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 13.7 48% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 20.5 DQ Write 33.8 DQ Mixed 22 18% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 193GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 89 94 82 81 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 103 Write 86 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 91.4 56% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.1 162% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 75%
Generic Storage Device 4GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 1336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5 4.9 5 4.5 5 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.67% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.9 8% 6.97 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.4 18% 6.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 90.5 44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T WS PRO Builds (Compare 253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T WS PRO

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	45x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	33x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	15x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	15x

SSD
GOODRAM 240GBBench 79%, 8,481 samples	8x
CS900 1TB SSDPNYBench 78%, 7,281 samples	8x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	8x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	52x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	35x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16