Today's hottest deals

Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration512 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$100
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 411
56% 415 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84C2) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 16
Parallax 16.7
16% 17.3 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 16.6
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 481
Mixed 374
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 55
189% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 234
210% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
882GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 80.2
Mixed 62.3
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Samsung Mighty Drive 4GB
0GB free, PID 1a23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.2
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.3
8% 9.07 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 7%
VBTM Store'n'go 2GB
1GB free, PID 0020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 3.3
Mixed 5.3
7% 4.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 5%
Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00 250GB
71GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 42 41 41 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.9% Very poor
Read 46.3
Write 42
Mixed 25
SusWrite 41.1
51% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 19.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback