MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 19:30
Run Duration416 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 66
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 907
81% 683 Pts
64-Core 2,383
148% 2,383 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
MSI(1462 3711) ≥ 4GB; MSI ventus
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 195
Parallax 228
107% 185 fps
MRender 251
Gravity 207
Splatting 132
154% 196 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 119%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2272 833 834 837 836 838 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,600
Write 2,360
Mixed 1,863
SusWrite 1,075
442% 1,975 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 92.7
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 944
714% 957 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 309%
Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
671GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2332 2195 1527 1550 1544 1555 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2588
Write 2,279
Mixed 1,965
SusWrite 1,784
484% 2,154 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 93.5
312% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,035
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 981
740% 990 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 354%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
863GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2382 2205 1491 1502 1509 1499 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,598
Write 2,318
Mixed 1,922
SusWrite 1,765
483% 2,151 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 93.1
311% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 969
734% 985 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 353%
Great: 372%
Corsair Force LX 256GB-$129
225GB free
Firmware: N0530C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 284 284 284 284 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 502
Write 284
Mixed 282
SusWrite 284
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 34.8
123% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 185
165% 249 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 178 180 178 179 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 185
Mixed 111
SusWrite 179
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 111%
Great: 109%
ST916031 4AS 160GB
125GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 37
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 35.7
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 18%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 128GB-$51
91GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 31 24 23 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 104
Write 69.5
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 26.3
71% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.1
140% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 46%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 8GB
6GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.8 11 9.8 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.1% Very poor
Read 92.3
Write 10.5
Mixed 14
SusWrite 9.6
29% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
55% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBD 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 54.5
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 52.8
149% 52.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 21.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 132%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $808
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback