Gigabyte GA-EP45T-DS3R

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EP45T-DS3R (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090903
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '19 at 00:59
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5470 1,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 117 55% 86.5 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 234 30% 230 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088 6,806 User benchmarks, average bench 47% EVGA(3842 2794) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1670 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Lighting 62.8 Reflection 63.2 Parallax 81.1 51% 69.1 fps	MRender 78.3 Gravity 67 Splatting 55 53% 66.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB 13,747 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 100GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 392 361 398 190 294 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 689 Write 432 Mixed 198 SusWrite 337 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 174 4K Mixed 14.8 148% 70.9 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 58.8 113% 227 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 237%
Nvme MS1PC5ED3ORA3.2T 3TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 3TB free (System drive) Firmware: KPYA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 941 1374 1464 1459 1289 1200 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	241% Outstanding	Read 1,551 Write 1,568 Mixed 889 SusWrite 1,288 298% 1,324 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 65.8 243% 94.2 MB/s	DQ Read 971 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 476 375% 543 MB/s
Poor: 228% ↑ This bench: 241% Great: 310%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 249GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 32 31 39 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 103 Write 96.8 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 32.9 55% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 355GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 32 31 39 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 92.2 Write 91.9 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 32.8 52% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 76%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 653GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 31 30 38 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 94.2 Write 63.3 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 31.8 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 418GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 31 30 38 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 89 Write 88.6 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 31.5 47% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 57%
Generic USB CF Reader 4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID null, Samsung 16GB SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.2 3.8 4.5 4.5 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	2.76% Terrible	Read 8 Write 4.5 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 4 6% 4.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.76% Great: 13%
Generic USB SD Reader 16GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 11GB free, PID null, SanDisk 4GB CompactFlash SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 6.2 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	6.66% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 17.2 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 1.4 18% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 64% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.66% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EP45T-DS3R Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45T-DS3R

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	2x

GPU
RX 6600-XTAMD $334Bench 107%, 21,558 samples	2x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
M500 240GBCrucial $73Bench 77%, 31,779 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	4x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353