Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9410 APU (2016 M.SR) 6,306 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Memory 28.2 1-Core 25.9 2-Core 76.9 24% 43.7 Pts	4-Core 69.5 8-Core 76.6 10% 73.1 Pts	64-Core 58.8 4% 58.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 81FC) 384MB Ram: 384MB, Driver: 19.4.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 1.91 1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 64 25 104 91 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 318 Write 206 Mixed 194 SusWrite 91.6 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 12.2 47% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 55%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB 27,655 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: HEF01C SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 20 20 12 14 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5644EB0-CPB M471A5143EB0-CPB 6GB 242 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2133, 2133 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7.9 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.6 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 266 15% 266 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16