QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 13:56
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 193
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 716
65% 546 Pts
64-Core 1,771
110% 1,771 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 70%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,780
Write 1,757
Mixed 1,956
410% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 21.8
87% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 245
188% 255 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 45
144% 50.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.7
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 119%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback