Asus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 00:04
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 189
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 591
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 44
Parallax 38.8
36% 42.3 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 35.2
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,399
Write 2,163
Mixed 1,302
434% 1,955 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 78.6
261% 91.3 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 837
DQ Mixed 880
661% 882 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
67GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 82
Write 86.5
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 101
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 186 189 189 188 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 115
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 186
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 113%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$70
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 134 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 145
Write 139
Mixed 76
SusWrite 133
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
834GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 103 104 105 103 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 60.3
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 102
64% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 158 163 165 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 108
Write 142
Mixed 102
SusWrite 156
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
318% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 94%
Maxtor OneTouch 500GB
37GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 6
Mixed 10
SusWrite 38.5
28% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.8
40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 21%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
37GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 63 64 63 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 88.5
Write 60.7
Mixed 59
SusWrite 62.8
88% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.8
250% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 42%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
86GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 39.8
50% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Extreme SSD 500GB
267GB free, PID 558c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 363 366 365 368 358 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 344
Write 338
Mixed 216
SusWrite 364
426% 315 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 31.3
2,870% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 60.7
DQ Mixed 36.5
3,413% 42 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 290%
Great: 374%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C13 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2230 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.8% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 1,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $581
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback