Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 203 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 395 52% 393 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 5.73 Parallax 3.94 4% 4.86 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 4.93 Splatting 3.52 4% 4.96 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 234 236 195 111 124 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.1% Good	Read 254 Write 213 Mixed 240 SusWrite 175 50% 221 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 30.3 116% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 175 137% 189 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 125%
HITACHI_ DK23DA-20 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 19GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 2.6 1.8 3.8 0 0.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.08% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 11.5 Mixed 12 SusWrite 2.1 13% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.08% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB 1,544 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.5 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16.6 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	81x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	38x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	29x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	19x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325