Biostar NF61S-M2B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar NF61S-M2B  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '19 at 00:52
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Memory 39.5
1-Core 15.9
2-Core 38.8
21% 31.4 Pts
4-Core 41.6
8-Core 48.6
6% 45.1 Pts
64-Core 54.9
3% 54.9 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 1905) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.44
1% 0.86 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160310AS 160GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 30 18 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 60
Write 28.8
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 19.2
22% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback