Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateMay 05 '19 at 12:04
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 119
57% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 438
40% 335 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 28.3
20% 30.5 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 25.8
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 102 134 133 111 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 436
Write 335
Mixed 358
SusWrite 157
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 0.5
72% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 48.7
DQ Write 7.3
DQ Mixed 45
29% 33.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 100%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
91GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 132 134 132 131 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 476
Write 447
Mixed 309
SusWrite 162
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 46.8
155% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 254
188% 247 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
929GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 166 174 172 171 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 161
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 169
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 110%
CCR-70 8GB
4GB free, PID e0ed
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
2.6% Terrible
Read 9
Write 2.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3
5% 4.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback