TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus N90SC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N90SC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUS N90SC
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100121
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 03 '19 at 12:00
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 52.8
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 58.4
31% 47.2 Pts
4-Core 56.5
8-Core 58
8% 57.2 Pts
64-Core 57.3
4% 57.3 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 31.1%
 Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220M
Asus(1043 203B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 5
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.95 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 2.22%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 31 46 50 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 47.9
Write 51.5
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 38.3
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 24.8%
 Great: 43%
Flash USB Disk 8GB
6GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 7.2 7.9 7.9 8.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 10.7
Write 16.7
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 9
18% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.5
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 13%
 Great: 15%
FUJITSU MJA2500BH G2 500GB
283GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 14 15 14 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.5% Very poor
Read 21.2
Write 17.2
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 14
23% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 11.5%
 Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 10.4%
 Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical N90SC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus N90SC

CPU
Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples2x
Pentium T4400Intel  $110Bench 34%, 7,903 samples2x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel  $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples1x
GPU
GeForce GT 220MNvidiaBench 2%, 962 samples5x
RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback