ACER Aspire M3641

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	ACER Aspire M3641 (all builds)
Motherboard	ACER MCP73PV
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '19 at 10:54
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Memory 72.9 1-Core 26 2-Core 51.5 36% 50.1 Pts	4-Core 92 8-Core 95.8 12% 93.9 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 130 236 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1B0A 9015) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 320.49 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.12% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 5.96 Parallax 1.12 0% 2.4 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.74 3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.12% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1O SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 48 11 8.1 21 58 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7.7 Write 27.3 SusWrite 27.3 15% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
WDC WD16 00BEVS-22RST0 160GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 139GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 29 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 25.8 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 28.3 33% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 19%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 256GB-$43 436 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 119GB free, PID 5588 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 46 54 55 51 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 81.9 Write 62.7 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 52.6 73% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 6.6 329% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.97% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.97% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M3641 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: ACER Aspire M3641

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	5x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x
Pentium Dual E2200Intel $54Bench 33%, 8,325 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9800 GTNvidiaBench 5%, 19,550 samples	1x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	1x
860 EVO 250GBSamsungBench 69%, 50 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	8x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $74

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16