HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '19 at 18:43
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 78.7 2-Core 188 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 357 48% 357 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.3 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.5% Average	Lighting 57.1 Reflection 43.3 Parallax 60.4 46% 53.6 fps	MRender 48.7 Gravity 50.1 Splatting 40.9 38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IRP-SSDPR-S25B-240 240GB 749 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM02.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 284 289 307 303 306 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 487 Write 311 Mixed 301 SusWrite 297 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 27 94% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 136 139% 224 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 111%
Kingston DT R400 8GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 1687 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 16 15 12 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	7.36% Terrible	Read 21 Write 10.2 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 13.3 17% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.36% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 4,223 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	685x
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	593x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16