Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 20:39
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 154
70% 114 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 373
47% 359 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gainward(10B0 17C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 118
Parallax 107
89% 112 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 102
Splatting 89.6
78% 96.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDMCEAC180A3L 180GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LLGi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 131 137 132 127 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 329
Write 190
Mixed 247
SusWrite 139
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 37.1
146% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 199
163% 234 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 77%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
238GB free
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 79.5
Write 78.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 75.1
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 9905458-026.A00LF Kingston 99U5458-005.A01LF 859B CT51264BA1339.D16F 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.5% Average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback