Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Memory 90.9 1-Core 137 2-Core 265 91% 164 Pts	4-Core 557 8-Core 556 74% 556 Pts	64-Core 550 34% 550 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 366A) CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1729 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.1% Average	Lighting 61.4 Reflection 63.7 Parallax 56.7 50% 60.6 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 58.4 Splatting 50.8 47% 58.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 56 56 57 56 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
HUAWEI MMC Storage 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	5.78% Terrible	Read 5.3 Write 5.5 Mixed 3.8 SusWrite 4.9 7% 4.88 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.1 82% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$45 47,721 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	77.9% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 24.9 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 29.6 SC Mixed 23.4 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	98x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	76x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	68x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $895