Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180725
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 15:35
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$163
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 210
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 596
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 87.3
57% 75.1 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 55.6
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABX0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 131 121 120 147 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 127
Write 152
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 135
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.3
108% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
234GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 137 139 141 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 133
Write 108
Mixed 71
SusWrite 139
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78%
Great: 112%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
3TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 162 165 165 166 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 168
Write 148
Mixed 121
SusWrite 164
202% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 100%
WDC WD10 EADS-22M2B0 1TB
186GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 38 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 33
Write 32.2
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 37.6
44% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
VendorCo ProductCode 268GB
250GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.2 3.6 5.1 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 2.3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 4.7
6% 5.62 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 23.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 20.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback