Lenovo 2746P4G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2746P4G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2746P4G
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 03:41
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5870
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 40.4
30% 41.6 Pts
4-Core 43.8
8-Core 37.6
6% 40.7 Pts
64-Core 41.4
3% 41.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 20E4) 783MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2555
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.42
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.47 fps
MRender 0.38
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.61
0% 0.56 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS722010K9SA00 100GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC2Z
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 52 59 57 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 21.7
Write 25.5
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 54.9
21% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22%
Great: 37%
TDKMedia TF 250 Drive 16GB
3GB free, PID 0529
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 6 8.6 8.4 7.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 7
12% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback