Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q-PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 11:14
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 76.3
40% 61 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 150
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Nvidia(10DE 0715) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 314.22
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.87% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 1.41
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 3.39
3% 3.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.87%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD162HJ 160GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KF100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 49 57 61 51 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 65.9
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 53.1
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HDP725050GLAT80 500GB-$89
287GB free
Firmware: GM4OA4CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 85 85 86 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 82.3
Write 80.7
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 83.5
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback