Asus P7H55-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '19 at 16:47
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 540-$60 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 65.5 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 148 56% 96.9 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 190 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz) 20,588 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8383) 1.5GB Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.92% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 0.91 1% 1.06 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.87 1% 1.38 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.92% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 404GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1C2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 146 151 156 202 159 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.2% Poor	Read 152 Write 92.3 Mixed 79 SusWrite 166 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 9.6 37% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 10.5 DQ Write 19 DQ Mixed 16.6 12% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$33 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 891GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 115 116 116 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 103 Write 103 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 115 70% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 68%
USB Flash Disk 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 27GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	9.67% Terrible	Read 29 Write 22.5 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 13.9 29% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 60% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.67% Great: 27%
SAMSUNG HD300LD 300GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 223GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 22.3 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 13.4 27% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 17%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB 811 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 25.8 Mixed 24 SusWrite 13.8 31% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.6% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 13.2 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M PRO Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M PRO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	76x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	69x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	28x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	24x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	15x
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	7x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	163x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	113x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $326

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16