Biostar Hi-Fi A70U3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi A70U3P  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '19 at 19:02
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 64
2-Core 119
44% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PowerColor(148C 2385) 2GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 27
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 33.5
22% 30 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 31.9
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN01SM19EG120GB 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0724A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 126 83 83 81 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 385
Write 330
Mixed 214
SusWrite 117
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 4.9
78% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 43.4
DQ Mixed 18.8
20% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST3250312CS 250GB-$90
194GB free
Firmware: ES13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 100 101 102 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 98.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 99.5
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory PSD32G160081 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi A70U3P Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi A70U3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback