Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130111
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '19 at 18:51
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 64.8 2-Core 120 58% 91.7 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 302 32% 258 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.8% Average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 62.4 49% 62.1 fps	MRender 72.1 Gravity 60.3 Splatting 0.13 32% 44.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS13 11 240GB SSD 452 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3GB free Firmware: CS13 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 363 Write 394 Mixed 322 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 28.4 97% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 176 140% 196 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 43 30 20 21 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.94% Terrible	Read 7 Write 19.3 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 27.3 11% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.2 50% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 9.94% Great: 77%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 15 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 28.2 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 16.7 18% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.7 171% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 66%
Sony Card_R/W -CF 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 2GB free, PID 01bd Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.03% Terrible	Read 24.9 Write 24.4 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 1.8 24% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.3 82% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.03% Great: 16%
Sony Card_R/W -SD 64GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 35GB free, PID 01bd Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	7.04% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 18.5 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 13.2 23% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.04% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.1% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 15.3 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 12.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	428x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	389x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	203x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	108x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	67x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	66x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	51x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	32x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	46x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16