Asus P8Z77-V LX2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX2  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMar 30 '19 at 16:59
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 382
52% 385 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 14.7
14% 15.3 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 17.2
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 843 429 425 479 495 467 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
439GB free
Firmware: 1AA01110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 74.3
Write 14.8
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 74.3
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 60%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
80GB free
Firmware: VT100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 53 53 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 55.4
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 53.7
36% 48.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 38%
TOSHIBA MK6459GSX 640GB
36GB free, PID 0214
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 32.9
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 35.9
38% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX2 Builds (Compare 1,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback