Gigabyte GA-Z97M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 22:31
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 252
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 471
65% 483 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Nvidia(10DE 12D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.8% Good
Lighting 81.3
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 70.9
66% 78 fps
MRender 89.9
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 74.5
65% 80.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 336
Mixed 144
71% 324 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 36
110% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 108
106% 173 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
548GB free
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 411 415 426 425 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 106
Mixed 353
SusWrite 419
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 40.8
154% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 228
199% 294 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
588GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 193 194 192 194 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 136
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 193
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
663GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 114
Write 121
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 106
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 82%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
400GB free
Firmware: 060E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 102 102 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 103
Write 77.5
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 101
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 66%
WDC WD10 03FZEX-00MK2A0 1TB
64GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 40.2
Write 43
Mixed 29
SusWrite 42.6
53% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
137% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 24%
307GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 42.2
Write 35.7
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 42.7
53% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 29%
Mass Storage Device 500GB
46GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 31
Mixed 29
SusWrite 40.9
47% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 22.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 24
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97M-D3H Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97M-D3H - $126

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $589
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback