ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 343524U

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 343524U (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 343524U
Memory	14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '16 at 09:48
Run Duration	444 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3520M 19,660 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 66.2 1-Core 33 2-Core 62.3 37% 53.8 Pts	4-Core 81.6 8-Core 81.8 11% 81.7 Pts	64-Core 82 5% 82 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 2203) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.21% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 1.66 2% 2.43 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.61 3% 3.04 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.21% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 900GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12307 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 172 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 54 47 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19188438440	85.5% Excellent	Read 520 Write 497 Mixed 412 106% 477 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 25 96% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 55.3 57% 93.3 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 301GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1723 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 103 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 46 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3794361472	60.5% Good	Read 494 Write 114 Mixed 116 52% 241 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 22.1 97% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 75.9 DQ Mixed 46 49% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 126%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 116GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 9.49 Mixed 12 17% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.55 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.48 68% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 37%
Kingston DTLocker+G3 64GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 42GB free, PID 169d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 14.4 Mixed 18.5 24% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.78 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 1.26 138% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 48%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 8.74 Mixed 10.9 16% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.16 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.69 80% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 31%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 26.3 Write 8.7 Mixed 10.8 16% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.04 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.69 77% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 31%
Apricorn Secure Key 3.0 30GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 10GB free, PID 1407 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 27.6 Write 20.1 Mixed 23.3 29% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.45 4K Write 4.36 4K Mixed 2.68 260% 4.16 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34.6% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 13.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8.4 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback