HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9470m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180727
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '19 at 09:55
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3437U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 123
57% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 178
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 2.97
3% 4.12 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 7.57
4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 386 384 350 379 391 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 437
Write 411
Mixed 252
SusWrite 375
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 25.3
84% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 136
140% 230 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 1078 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 23 26 26 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.93% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 15.1
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 25.7
24% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
426GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 60 61 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 65
Write 59.2
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 60.2
77% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
146% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 32 31 28 27 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 20.5
Write 27.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 27.3
33% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 14
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback