PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131003 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 26 '19 at 01:06 |
Run Duration | 209 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
58.4%
Above average
|
54% 87.3 Pts
|
32% 246 Pts
|
17% 279 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.3%
Poor
|
31% 37.4 fps
|
26% 31.7 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 89 83 71 67 70 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
27% 122 MB/s
|
94% 34.7 MB/s
|
30% 46.8 MB/s
|
![]() Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 150 151 152 150 MB/s
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
95% 130 MB/s
|
163% 1.27 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
237GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 89 87 71 68 70 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
84% 115 MB/s
|
151% 1.1 MB/s
|
|
![]() WDC WD64 00AAKS-22A7B0 640GB
463GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 105 107 106 105 MB/s
|
46.1%
Average
|
132% 98.1 MB/s
|
118% 1.37 MB/s
|
|
![]() ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
72GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 0.8 0.3 0.1 MB/s
|
20.3%
Poor
|
67% 56.8 MB/s
|
88% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
![]() ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 105 107 106 104 MB/s
|
54.8%
Above average
|
161% 127 MB/s
|
88% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
![]() ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.9 0.7 0.4 0.2 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
126% 105 MB/s
|
91% 1.1 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.4%
Below average
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
23% 8.07 GB/s
|
47% 84.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 90x |
FX-8320AMD $203Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 54x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 44x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 15x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $777 |