Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131107
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '19 at 17:28
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 145
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 461
44% 366 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 51.9
32% 42.2 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 39.7
29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 102 95 97 69 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 412
Write 371
Mixed 332
SusWrite 108
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 33
124% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 174
145% 209 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
139GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 71
SusWrite 83.1
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 85%
KINGSTON SUV400S37480G 480GB
72GB free, PID 55aa
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 214 127 132 130 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
172% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 217
Mixed 160
SusWrite 156
251% 189 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 3.1
1,296% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 20.4
DQ Write 41.9
DQ Mixed 25.2
2,358% 29.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 172%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.6% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback