Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120615
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 22:00
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 198
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 366
51% 375 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 59.1
55% 65 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 52.7
50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 52 53 82 84 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 75.8
Write 84.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 68.5
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
51GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 86.5
Write 85.7
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 77.2
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 68%
USB Flash Memory 16GB
11GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 2.7 3.5 2.6 3.2 3.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 12.5
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 3.1
15% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-455.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback