Acer Aspire E5-573G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ZORO_BH
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150527
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 24 '16 at 10:59
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 53.9
2-Core 97.4
49% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 99.3
8-Core 99.3
13% 99.3 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Acer(1025 098A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
2.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 3.5
2% 4.56 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.22
4% 4.91 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.87%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 80.9
Write 70.6
Mixed 83.8
59% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.25
74% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 62%
SanDisk uSD SDDR-289 16GB
14GB free, PID b6ba
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 86.5
Write 22
Mixed 37.2
51% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.38
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.75
75% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 14.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-573G Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-573G - $680

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $708
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback