Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131009
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '19 at 07:34
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 199 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 584 61% 489 Pts	64-Core 743 46% 743 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	52.8% Above average	Lighting 65.4 Reflection 70 Parallax 66.4 53% 67.3 fps	MRender 72.1 Gravity 63.4 Splatting 56.9 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$81 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: 90WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 385 387 388 389 388 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 451 Write 334 Mixed 216 SusWrite 386 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 83.1 4K Mixed 43.3 131% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 90.8 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 132 121% 177 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 117%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$165 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 6TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 200 175 197 186 193 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$165 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2.5TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 106 104 132 136 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 31.1 Write 20.9 Mixed 12.4 SusWrite 117 33% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 28% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 106%
ST330006 51AS 3TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 802GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 22 18 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.14% Terrible	Read 11.9 Write 30.6 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 15.9 29% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.14% Great: 57%
ST330006 51AS 3TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 85GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 7.2 4.1 5.6 6.2 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	9.19% Terrible	Read 46 Write 42.5 Mixed 30 SusWrite 5.6 39% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.19% Great: 57%
ST330006 51AS 3TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 217GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 7.2 4.2 5.6 6.2 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 119 Write 64.7 Mixed 50 SusWrite 5.6 68% 59.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 57%
ST330006 51AS 3TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 918GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 50 46 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 104 Write 94.4 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 50.8 103% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 57%
WD My Book 25EE 10TB 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 702GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 156 153 157 158 165 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 152 Write 161 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 158 193% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.2 210% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 99%
WD My Book 6TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 727GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6 6.1 6.4 6.3 6.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2.55% Terrible	Read 6 Write 4.7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 6.2 8% 5.73 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A200 CMX8GX3M2A200 BLT8G3D1608DT CMX8GX3M2A200 CMX8GX3M2A200 BLT8G3D1608DT 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.5% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 22.3 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.6 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UD5 Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	75x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	52x
Core i7-3930KIntelBench 77%, 4,060 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	8x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	5x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	8x
16G-D3-2133-M 2x8GBUnknownBench 45%, 39 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 64%, 1,012 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $312

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383