Lenovo 20205

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20205  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20205
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150507
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 05:19
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium A1018
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 67.9
46% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 89.2
8-Core 99.8
12% 94.5 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5011) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
1.52% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.46 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 3.13
2% 2.35 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.52%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 78 74 89 92 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.4% Poor
Read 194
Write 95.3
Mixed 104
SusWrite 95.3
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 11.9
46% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 38.7
DQ Write 41.1
DQ Mixed 33.2
27% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
102GB free
Firmware: JA0O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 24 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 20.1
Mixed 19
SusWrite 22.5
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF0 320GB
253GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 33 33 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.2% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 30.1
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 30.2
37% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20205 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20205

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback