bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150702
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 18 '19 at 05:13
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930MX
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.2% Good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 399
51% 387 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.15.1.50
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 18
Parallax 13.4
13% 15.7 fps
MRender 17.1
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 23.7
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 64GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 45 47 66 71 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 60.9
Write 43.3
Mixed 40
SusWrite 59.7
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 91%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
6GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4 3.6 4.7 5 5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 11.1
Write 8.8
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 4.6
11% 8.68 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback