Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X299 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 02:43
Run Duration435 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 292
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,172
104% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,625
101% 1,625 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 421.65
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 197
Parallax 192
144% 189 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 181
Splatting 129
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,136
Write 1,396
Mixed 897
325% 1,476 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 68.6
270% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,243
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 441
425% 695 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
WD Blue 1TB-$105
319GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 192 193 193 192 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 375
Write 363
Mixed 279
SusWrite 192
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 44.8
156% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 212
169% 237 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
392GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 193 194 193 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 377
Write 368
Mixed 347
SusWrite 193
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 55.8
182% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 242
183% 246 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
405GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 496 492 496 496 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 487
Mixed 415
SusWrite 494
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 68.6
231% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$152
264GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2376 2117 1050 1077 1083 1084 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,570
Write 2,387
Mixed 1,646
SusWrite 1,464
452% 2,017 MB/s
4K Read 72.1
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 106
366% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,460
DQ Write 1,345
DQ Mixed 1381
1,042% 1,395 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 368%
Great: 372%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 1TB
344GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 262 260 262 262 262 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 404
Write 384
Mixed 352
SusWrite 261
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 29.7
96% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 136
105% 141 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 87%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$152
196GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1538 1250 1246 1251 1252 1254 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 2,559
Write 2,372
Mixed 1,631
SusWrite 1,298
440% 1,965 MB/s
4K Read 72.1
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 106
367% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,467
DQ Write 1,346
DQ Mixed 1,381
1,043% 1,398 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 358%
Great: 372%
AFT CF PRO88 Reader 128GB
114GB free, PID 5111
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 138 141 140 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
Read 143
Write 139
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 140
162% 122 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.8
184% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%
Drobo 5D 70.5TB
53TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 175 176 176 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 287
Mixed 188
SusWrite 175
297% 216 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 2.1
311% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 29.2
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 9.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,628
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback