Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110525
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '19 at 02:18
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 167 72% 119 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 486 51% 406 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 117 Parallax 98 91% 109 fps	MRender 97.8 Gravity 102 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 323GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 409 425 427 425 423 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 450 Mixed 362 SusWrite 418 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 40.6 137% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 183 185% 299 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 111%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 167GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 76 75 76 75 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 76.8 Write 76.5 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 75 53% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 351GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 95 95 95 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 66.7 Write 59 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 94.4 48% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 165GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 114 114 114 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 107 Write 107 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 113 72% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 717GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 63 63 64 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 69.7 Write 62.5 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 62.7 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 51%
LGE USB Drive 16GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 70d6 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.4 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	5.93% Terrible	Read 23.3 Write 7.3 Mixed 7 SusWrite 6.4 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.93% Great: 10%
SAMSUNG HM641JI 640GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 574GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 90 90 90 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 86.7 Write 52.8 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 88.6 91% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 36%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 389GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 119 Write 117 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 12.1 97% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 61%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 0301 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.8% Terrible	Read 21 Write 17.7 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 12.3 20% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 36% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.8% Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 13GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.5 5 4.9 5.1 4.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 5.2 Mixed 10 SusWrite 4.8 13% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.6 143% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 5GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.1 4.6 4.8 4.7 4.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 3.7 Mixed 10 SusWrite 4.6 13% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.6 136% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 3GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 25 20 17 23 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 105 Write 40.8 Mixed 59.2 SusWrite 28.6 69% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 3.5 234% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 40%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 8GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 32 22 22 23 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 105 Write 32.3 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 30.9 64% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.2 218% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	48.2% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Maximus IV GENE-Z Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	180x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	102x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	26x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	18x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	19x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	10x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $661

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16